<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Wallpaper Script Forum Topic: Quantity or Quality</title>
<link>http://wallpaperscript.com/forum/</link>
<description>Wallpaper Script FORUM</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:53:00 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>david on "Quantity or Quality"</title>
<link>http://wallpaperscript.com/forum/topic/quantity-or-quality-1#post-2558</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 05:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2558@http://wallpaperscript.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;for me quality is important rather than quantity. More members like ADI NIKHIL can guide
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>prateekj on "Quantity or Quality"</title>
<link>http://wallpaperscript.com/forum/topic/quantity-or-quality-1#post-2543</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>prateekj</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2543@http://wallpaperscript.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;This question is for admins of high traffic wallpaper sites.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;What do you think works better in the long run? Large number of wallpapers or small number of high quality wallpapers?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I ask this question because there is a lot of free wallpaper content available on the internet. Problem is that most of this content is average quality.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

